 |
Breaking News!
SJSU
Campus Protest
Thursday, April 29th
11:30 am
Amphitheatre, Student Union
|
See extensive
comments from SJSU Union Rep:
STEVE SLOAN
His online
commentary...How staff file
discrimination complaints
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATED POSTINGS FROM OUR SCHOOL
Information, Comments & Suggestions from
Faculty & Staff
From Bob Rucker: CASA Faculty &
Staff Get Involved! 4/26
I asked Dean Bullock over the
weekend if he would circulate a
message
asking CASA depts. & schools to be
open to allowing our journalism
students to do stories about the
impact of the staff decisions.
The dean was great about it and
immediately sent out the word!
By Monday morning one faculty person
in Kinesiology responded to him
which he forwarded to me to share
with all of you:
Dear Dr. Bullock,
It was great to meet you at the
Honors Convocation on Friday.
Shirley speaks very highly of
you, and I take her opinions
seriously. :)
Thank you for sending this
email. This is truly a difficult
situation. Several of my
students (including some of my
very best students) don't even
know if they can afford to come
back next semester. This is
extremely upsetting to me, and
of course, far more so to them.
So I would like to help out in
whatever way I can. Please let
your journalism connections know
that I'll be happy to open up my
Stress Management class to
journalists on Tuesday and/or
Thursday morning from 9:00 to
10:15 am. The room is YUH 201A.
They are also welcome to contact
me individually.
Best, Karin
********************
Karin A. Jeffery
Department of Kinesiology
San José State University
karinjeffery1@gmail.com
www.sjsu.edu/people/karin.jeffery
|
From: Amy Freitag - Monday, 4/26
This is a great email Professor
Rucker.
I am quite impressed that Dean
Bullock forwarded it, and to all
CASA employees.
I have heard that there will be
a ‘campuswide protest’ and
possible “walkout” on
Thursday at 11:30 a.m.
I
have not heard of any
“walkout.” Where did this
information come from?
I would like to find more
information.
I received one notice that said
there would be a CSUEU
General Membership Meeting at
that time. Then I got another
notice that said there
would be a “Rally and March Against Layoffs at SJSU” at that same time.
I have no other details.
I’m really curious about a
possible “walkout” and why I’m
not aware of
it as a staff member
Follow-up from Amy:
Just FYI. I found out
from a reliable source,
“
A walk-out, if any, is
not part of our event
nor is this action
approved by CSUEU.”
From: Cecelia Baldwin, Advertising
Professor - Monday, 4/26
I'm having
a hard time working on the (JMC)
letter. I've done part of it and
it's mostly editing
to get to the main ideas sooner.
Take a look at it and see if you
think it is helping at all and
I can work further on it. But if I'm missing the point then I should
know.
Ok, now the second problem, for me
that is, is I don't think diversity
is legally a possible
way to retain employee (to ensure they would be laid off). Merit would
be. But there are so many
subjective/potentially unfair
aspects to merit. Is it a moral
method of layoffs - I don't know.
I go back and forth on it.
So anyway, my view is to look
forward - examine the impact of
these layoffs
(is the impact it had on JMC
diversity typical for other schools
and departments - and a call
to develop a series of 'methods' of
actively RE- achieving the diversity
we had before the layoffs.
(the only thing I'm thinking of is that diversity of hiring committees
should be ensured even
if it means outside of department
consultants etc.)
Anyway, let me know what you think.
Oh and as you can see I had trouble
with the file -
it doesn't hold it's format - even
tried to download into google docs
to get it but couldn't -
so if you want me to continue save
it as a .doc file. If I'm just not
getting across
what you want, that's fine - let me
know.
Thanks Bob for all the work you have
done on this! And that was a
wonderful email
you sent the dean and CASA faculty!!
Cecelia
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note from the JMC School Director:
Friday, April 23rd
Colleagues:
Please forgive the recent flurry of
emails.
Seems a busy time and there’s lots
happening.
Thanks to all who have participated
in the staffing discussion,
especially Bob who has, yes, done
the heavy lifting.
Let’s sustain the momentum.
Thanks to all who have worked on the
scholarships-a big
and time-consuming job. We may
change some procedures next year.
Please remember to:
Attend the Graduate
Presentations Tues. evening April 27
in MLK.
Reply to Ken Haycock’s short
survey for our strategic planning.
Pass any completed class peer
evaluations to Amy
(and thanks to several for stepping
up ).
RSVP for the Dean’s reception on
May 3. Promises to be a nice event.
Carla Marinucci, our outstanding
alumna, plans to be here in time
for the Daily critique on May 3.
Others may want to
invite her in the afternoon.
On Tues.May 11, a Yahoo Web editor
will put on a clinic for us on
“writing for the Web” at 1:30 in DBH
133. Several of you expressed
interest in sending your students.
Please announce and support this
activity.
Part-time faculty should see Amy.
Evaluations await your signatures.
You are an incredible cohort!
I will be away most of next week on
a program evaluation trip.
Kathleen Martinelli can sign for me.
I’ll be on email throughout.
Sylvia should be back from Jury Duty
mid-week and Amy is holding
everything together. Thanks for all
your patience.
Bill Briggs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
After speaking
with Michael
about his
thoughts, he
said it was ok
to share with
you his
thoughts...and I
offer mine one
last time
afterward. Bob
Rucker
-------------------------------------------
From
Michael Cheers:
I carefully read
and re-read your
letter.
I support the
cause, but the
tone of the
letter, in my
opinion, is
"preaching"
rather than a
concise and
forceful "call
to action".
What exactly do
you hope to
achieve? Rally
the faculty
campus-wide? Get
media exposure?
Ok, fine, then
what?
I understand
others have made
edits, etc. Can
the letter be
shortened, yet
still maintain
its power?
D. Michael
Cheers
--------------------------------------
Thanks Michael.
I absolutely
appreciate this
sort of honest
and candid input
and have been
wondering where
has it been this
week? "Preachy"
seems like
a fair
evaluation,
and certainly
that was not my
purpose. Someone
stepping up to
offer a re-write
would be most
welcome! Waiting
back to see how
it all unfolds
is more worthy
of our college
students
thinking and
approach.
I would be
happy
to read, review
and support
another letter
writing approach.
I'd be
thrilled if
someone else
came up with
other proactive
& creative JMC
school
initiatives on
this issue.
Anything to kick
start more
enthusiasm,
first among us
and then the
campus
community.
Yes...we
know....People
are so busy
right now. I
hear that alot...So
are you.... So
am I. So let's
be clear. I am
not mad.
I am tired,...Tired
of being
expected to be
the only
consistently
outspoken voice,
and do the heavy
lifting for JMC on
the importance
of diversity
appreciation and
inclusion.
Speaking eloquently
about what we
stand for when
everyone is
gathered as a
group is all
fine and good.
But my mother
taught me..."
never mind what
people say,
watch what they
do."
So far, with the
exception of a
few folks whose
comments have
been posted on
my website
(here), most in
the JMC
School have
seemed content
just to leave it
up to Bob to
do what our CASA
Dean encouraged
all of us to do
last
Monday...raise
campus awareness
and call people
to action.
Well... forgive
the sports
metaphor...but WE
all know we're
looking at a
long season
ahead with this
issue and our
protest . We
win by speaking
up to make a
difference, and
doing so over
the long
haul. Bob has
picked up this
ball again,
bounced it, run
with it, taken a
few shots and
scored a few
points. Now I am
passing the
ball on to
everyone
else.
OK Team JMC...
are you in this
thing, or not?
Don't worry
about having
weak knees. I
find it comes
with age.
GO TEAM!
Bob
|
From Amy
Freitag - Friday Afternoon 4/23
I
haven’t identified the core
reasons why I feel compelled to
have a voice but I do.
I am a member of the staff and staff have a view and perspective that
faculty and students often
are not aware. Of course, I can
only speak for myself.
The care and concern of the
faculty and students over the
staff layoffs is greatly
appreciated.
What currently stands out to me
in some of the dialogue is the
term “affected staff members,”
and the context of the sentences
that the term is included. ALL
staff members are affected by
this action (as well as the other stakeholders; faculty, students,
administration, the public).
The most pressing concern in my
opinion are our colleagues and
friends who have lost their
jobs and income. Staff can
often barely pay their bills
with their paycheck.
The next pressing issues are the
ones “left behind.” Those “left
behind” are nonetheless grateful
for having income but some need
to move to new and unknown units
and environments,
and others staying in their
current positions may be doing
triple workload.
With all of the dialogue, my
clear view of the issues
mentioned gets cluttered.
What are the core issues for the
faculty and students?
Is it that diversity was not a
part of the union contract and
included in the layoff process?
Is it that “unique job
performance” was not a part of
the layoff process?
Is it that seniority is a
unethical way of determine the
final layoffs?
Is it that we lost job positions? Is it that staff got laid off in
general, and now the resources
on campus will be limited?
My core issue is that we need to
get those job positions back
that have been eliminated.
We need to keep those personnel
hired so that they can pay their
bills, and not lose all the
efforts and energy that have
given SJSU.
The issues for me personally are
that some people lost their
lively hoods and that others
will have unbearable workloads.
My only ‘conflict’ with our
union is that pay raises are not
more of a priority.
I’ve been told that I lose money
by working here. Cost of living
goes up, but my salary does
not.
I personally do not believe the
core issue of this action is of
diversity, and that is not
because
I am a ignorant woman of
European descent. I believe
this as a member of the SJSU
staff for 10 plus
years. I am actually low on the
seniority level, even at 10
years. Our staff is rich and
deep in
diversity of individuals,
whether it be protected classes,
cultures, life experiences or
skills.
This diversity has not happened
only in the past couple years.
This diversity reaches, as
mentioned, to the core of the
living values of San Jose State
University. I wish I had some
statistics to quote.
Sincerely. The care and concern
of the faculty and students is
greatly appreciated.
I just wish this rallying to
staff defense would of happened
when the layoffs were a part of
the budget planning, not after
the action.
I do want to support the efforts
as I can. I don’t want to argue
or debate.
The issue of diversity is
actually close to my heart for
personal reasons in my family,
my
individual life experiences, as
well as the core of my graduate
degree education.
I have been a loyal employee at
SJSU because I had job security,
flexibility, good benefits,
and I believe I have helped
students graduate. These
reasons are quickly dissipating.
Thank you for hearing my side of
the story.
Amy Freitag
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update from
Bob Rucker - Friday Morning 4/23
Given the news above from Steve Sloan
about the planned rally next Thursday,
I suggest we finalize the wording in
our letter and get it published
and circulated early next week.
Jan Shaw has done an excellent job
editing draft one of this letter.
The revised
letter will be posted here by late
Friday.
Meanwhile...Our JMC students have
already begun to express their concerns,
and so have our two affected staff
members in the JMC School.
See the
commentary from RTVJ student Dan Lu.
It was sent to and published online by
the Spartan Daily. I encourage you to
speak to your classes about this
issue and invite more student reactions.
As one student in my class said this
week...
It's the year for student activism to
return to a place noted for it.
Compliments to the Spartan Daily for
their appreciation of this important
story
and their detailed efforts to fully
inform the campus!
This past Thursday, in my J132B (Adv.
Broadcast News Writing) class,
we began a special assignment on this issue for their final project.
To get us started, students have been
assigned to research the history of
labor negotiation
conflicts like this, plus find and study
local and national news reports on the
topic.
They know they must learn more about how
and why major personnel change
decisions have evolved over time with
"seniority" being the primary
determinant.
The class also plans to discretely
identify and ask laid off and
transferred staff on
campus if they'd like to talk about the
human impact of these economic moves. I
am and will
continue to caution them about the
individual's right to privacy concerns.
Jessie Pickett was the first to agree to
this and participate in a class press
conference.
He also agreed to have his comments
videotaped and used in any video news
report
we post on line or broadcast.
Silvia La Rosa and I spoke briefly
earlier this week. She has been on
jury duty and away from campus. My
J132B will extend an invitation to her,
other affected staff
on campus, plus representatives of
SJSU's administration, staff and faculty
unions to offer
their perspectives by participating in
one of our remaining hour long class
press
conference learning experiences.
All guests have or will be told that
this RTVJ class is developing a news
story for online posting
and possible broadcast nationwide.
My J163 students now have a continuing
relationship
with CNN where they provide west coast
video reactions to timely news and Bay
Area
human interest video news features. This
new student media approach is called
SJSU Online.
In the past year, their stories have
been broadcast on several CNN news
channels
and posted on their website main page.
In March, SJSU Online coverage
of local reaction to the Toyota recall
crisis received 37,000 views nationally
and internationally.
I encourage
you to keep your JMC School students
posted on developments
and engage their ideas for how to
creatively get involved with this
important campus issue. Like the CASA
Dean told us Monday, it would be
great to see a return to the 1960's
"Have A Voice!" activism on this campus.
Thanks!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amy Freitag
comments &
LAYOFF NOTICE LETTER Thursday,
April 22nd
I
wanted to share a primary source
regarding the staff layoffs.
I have attached the CSU letter to the
CSUEU union.
Layoffs were based on a budget number.
Approximately 56 vacant job positions
were eliminated first. Then changes
were made solely on job
classifications.
The job
classifications (and number of) were
identified and then eliminated. The
personnel affected
by these job eliminations, were then
identified by seniority and
re-assigned or laid off accordingly.
One Administrator I talked to, seemed to
think that “3 years was the magic
number,
” as she didn’t see anyone laid off who
had been working at SJSU 3 years or
longer.
I felt compelled to clarify how the
staff layoffs were determined.
It is important that the facts are known
so that all dialogue is properly
informed,
the wording of any official stance is
accurate and reflect the facts.
It is nice to see the support for staff
that are affected by the reassignments.
I personally think it would have been
ideal if the layoffs were avoided,
especially
when it was known that it was part of
the budget planning in the
beginning of Fall Semester 2009.
Amy
________________________________________________________________________
I do hope that we can get some sort of coverage to
expose this issue.
It does affect the whole campus and system throughout the State.
Tim Hendrick
Assistant Professor, Advertising
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done, Bob! I
think you effectively captured the sentiment of
the room yesterday. And you've also clearly
identified the problem of a seniority-based
(only) layoffs. Maybe this will be the beginning
of a real dialogue between the university and
the unions about how to operationalize our
diversity values. Monday's discussion has
prompted me to do some research about the ethics
of seniority-based layoffs. I'll let you know
what I find out. In the meantime, good work!
Matt
Mathew A. Cabot, Ph.D., APR
Associate Professor
School of Journalism and Mass Communications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BR Comments:
(Jan Shaw kindly
edited the letter, tightening up sentences and
offered very constructive suggestions, and said
she liked the letter. )
(Mack Lundstrom
stopped by my office to tell me the draft letter
offered more restraint and patience than he
might have. I share Mack's passion for this
issue however.)
(Silvia is aware of our efforts. She told me
today she is on jury duty this week but will be
around next week.
She appreciates our desire to help. I promised
her NOT to use her name or Jessie Picket's in
anything
public without their prior permission.)
(Jessie spoke with me briefly today, and is
aware of our efforts to generate a campus
response.
Both Jessie and Silvia are aware of our meeting
with the dean Tuesday.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two questions.
Do you have statistics including numbers and
self-identified members of protected classes for
all positions eliminated, staff reassignments,
and staff laidoffs compared to positions and
staff “left behind?”.
Do you have any primary resources (staff you
have talked to)?
Those may be core to the premise of your
argument, and good to include in your statment?
Amy
Freitag Resource Analyst
School of Journalism & Mass Communications
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob: Thoughtfully written. There are a number
of small edits. I’d probably be inclined to
condense it some, so I’m still mulling it over.
I think I’d be more direct in the beginning,
too. I’ll be interested in
what others think.
Dr. Bill Briggs
Director
School of Journalism and Mass Communications
________________________________________________________________________________
|