This is a private site. Not available for general public viewing.

JMC School Faculty & Staff - BLOG Comments

Proposed Campus Open Letter
            Draft #1 circulated by e-mail Wednesday, April 21st.

 


Breaking News!
  


SJSU Campus Protest
Thursday, April 29th   11:30 am
Amphitheatre, Student Union

 


See extensive comments from SJSU Union Rep:
STEVE SLOAN

His online commentary...How staff file discrimination complaints

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UPDATED POSTINGS FROM OUR SCHOOL


Information, Comments & Suggestions from Faculty & Staff
 

From Bob Rucker: CASA Faculty & Staff Get Involved!  4/26

I asked Dean Bullock over the weekend if he would circulate a message
asking CASA depts. & schools to be open to allowing our journalism
students to do stories about the impact of the staff decisions.
The dean was great about it and immediately sent out the word!
By Monday morning one faculty person in Kinesiology responded to him
which he forwarded to me to share with all of you:

Dear Dr. Bullock,

It was great to meet you at the Honors Convocation on Friday. Shirley speaks very highly of you, and I take her opinions seriously. :)

Thank you for sending this email. This is truly a difficult situation. Several of my students (including some of my very best students) don't even know if they can afford to come back next semester. This is extremely upsetting to me, and of course, far more so to them.

So I would like to help out in whatever way I can. Please let your journalism connections know that I'll be happy to open up my Stress Management class to journalists on Tuesday and/or Thursday morning from 9:00 to 10:15 am. The room is YUH 201A. They are also welcome to contact me individually.

Best, Karin

********************
Karin A. Jeffery
Department of Kinesiology
San José State University
karinjeffery1@gmail.com
www.sjsu.edu/people/karin.jeffery
 

From: Amy Freitag - Monday, 4/26

This is a great email Professor Rucker. 
I am quite impressed that Dean Bullock forwarded it, and to all CASA employees.
I have heard that there will be a ‘campuswide protest’ and possible “walkout” on
Thursday at 11:30 a.m.

 I have not heard of any “walkout.”  Where did this information come from?
I would like to find more information.

 I received one notice that said there would be a CSUEU
General Membership Meeting at that time.  Then I got another notice that said there
 would be a “Rally and March Against Layoffs at SJSU” at that same time.  
I have no other details.

I’m really curious about a possible “walkout” and why I’m not aware of
it as a staff member

Follow-up from Amy: Just FYI.  I found out from a reliable source, “
A walk-out, if any, is not part of our event nor is this action approved by CSUEU.” 

 

From: Cecelia Baldwin, Advertising Professor - Monday, 4/26

I'm having a hard time working on the (JMC) letter.  I've done part of it and it's mostly editing
to get to the main ideas sooner.  Take a look at it and see if you think it is helping at all and
 I can work further on it.  But if I'm missing the point then I should know.

Ok, now the second problem, for me that is, is I don't think diversity is legally a possible
 way to retain employee (to ensure they would be laid off).  Merit would be.  But there are so many subjective/potentially unfair aspects to merit.  Is it a moral method of layoffs - I don't know. 
I go back and forth on it. 

So anyway, my view is to look forward - examine the impact of these layoffs
(is the impact it had on JMC diversity typical for other schools and departments - and a call
to develop a series of 'methods' of actively RE- achieving the diversity we had before the layoffs. 
 (the only thing I'm thinking of is that diversity of hiring committees should be ensured even
if it means outside of department consultants etc.)

Anyway, let me know what you think.  Oh and as you can see I had trouble with the file -
it doesn't hold it's format - even tried to download into google docs to get it but couldn't -
so if you want me to continue save it as a .doc file.  If I'm just not getting across
what you want, that's fine - let me know.

Thanks Bob for all the work you have done on this!  And that was a wonderful email
you sent the dean and CASA faculty!!

Cecelia

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 



Note from the JMC School Director: Friday, April 23rd

 Colleagues:  Please forgive the recent flurry of emails.  
Seems a busy time and there’s lots happening.

Thanks to all who have participated in the staffing discussion,
especially Bob who has, yes, done the heavy lifting.  
Let’s sustain the momentum.

Thanks to all who have worked on the scholarships-a big
and time-consuming job.  We may change some procedures next year.

Please remember to:
    Attend the Graduate Presentations Tues. evening April 27 in MLK.
    Reply to Ken Haycock’s short survey for our strategic planning.
    Pass any completed class peer  evaluations to Amy
(and thanks to several for  stepping up ).
    RSVP for the Dean’s reception on May 3.  Promises to be a nice event.

Carla Marinucci, our outstanding alumna, plans to be here in time
for the Daily critique on May 3.  Others may want to
invite her in the afternoon.

On Tues.May 11, a Yahoo Web editor will put on a clinic for us on
“writing for the Web” at 1:30 in DBH 133.  Several of you expressed
interest in sending your students.  Please announce and support this activity.

Part-time faculty should see Amy.  Evaluations await your signatures.
 You are an incredible cohort!

I will be away most of next week on a program evaluation trip.  
Kathleen Martinelli can sign for me.  I’ll be on email throughout.  
Sylvia should be back from Jury Duty mid-week  and Amy is holding
everything together.  Thanks for all your patience.

Bill Briggs

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              After speaking with Michael about his thoughts, he said it was ok to share with
                       you his thoughts...and I offer mine one last time afterward. Bob Rucker
 
-------------------------------------------
From Michael Cheers:

I carefully read and re-read your letter.

I support the cause, but the tone of the letter, in my opinion, is "preaching" rather than a concise and forceful "call to action".

What exactly do you hope to achieve? Rally the faculty campus-wide? Get media exposure?

Ok, fine, then what?

I understand others have made edits, etc. Can the letter be shortened, yet still maintain its power?

D. Michael Cheers
--------------------------------------

Thanks Michael. I absolutely appreciate this sort of honest and candid input and have been wondering where has it been this week? "Preachy" seems like a fair evaluation, and certainly that was not my purpose. Someone stepping up to offer a re-write would be most welcome! Waiting back to see how it all unfolds is more worthy of our college students thinking and approach.

I would be happy to read, review and support another letter writing approach. I'd  be thrilled if someone else came up with other proactive & creative JMC school initiatives on this issue. Anything to kick start more enthusiasm, first among us and then the campus community.
 
Yes...we know....People are so busy right now.  I hear that alot...So are you.... So am I.  So let's be clear. I am not mad. I am tired,...Tired of being expected to be the only consistently outspoken voice, and do the heavy lifting for JMC on the importance of diversity appreciation and inclusion. 
 
Speaking eloquently about what we stand for when everyone is gathered as a group is all fine and good. But my mother taught me..." never mind what people say, watch what they do."

So far, with the exception of a few folks whose comments have been posted on my website (here), most in the JMC School have seemed content just to leave it up to Bob to do what our CASA Dean encouraged all of us to do last Monday...raise campus awareness
and call people to action.
 
Well... forgive the sports metaphor...but WE all know we're looking at a long season ahead with this issue and our protest . We win by speaking up to make a difference, and doing so over the long haul. Bob has picked up this ball again, bounced it, run with it, taken a few shots and scored a few points. Now I am passing the ball on to everyone else.

OK Team JMC... are you in this thing, or not?

Don't worry about having weak knees. I find it comes with age.

GO TEAM!

Bob

From Amy Freitag - Friday Afternoon 4/23

I haven’t identified the core reasons why I feel compelled to have a voice but I do. 
 I am a member of the staff and staff have a view and perspective that faculty and students often
are not aware.  Of course, I can only speak for myself.  

The care and concern of the faculty and students over the staff layoffs is greatly appreciated.   

What currently stands out to me in some of the dialogue is the term “affected staff members,”
and the context of the sentences that the term is included.   ALL staff members are affected by
 this action (as well as the other stakeholders; faculty, students, administration, the public). 

The most pressing concern in my opinion are our colleagues and friends who have lost their
jobs and income.  Staff can often barely pay their bills with their paycheck. 
The next pressing issues are the ones “left behind.”  Those “left behind” are nonetheless grateful
for having income but some need to move to new and unknown units and environments,
and others staying in their current positions may be doing triple workload.

With all of the dialogue, my clear view of the issues mentioned gets cluttered. 
What are the core issues for the faculty and students? 

Is it that diversity was not a part of the union contract and included in the layoff process? 
Is it that “unique job performance” was not a part of the layoff process? 
Is it that seniority is a unethical way of determine the final layoffs? 
 Is it that we lost job positions?  Is it that staff got laid off in general, and now the resources
on campus will be limited?  

My core issue is that we need to get those job positions back that have been eliminated. 
We need to keep those personnel hired so that they can pay their bills, and not lose all the
efforts and energy that have given SJSU.

The issues for me personally are that some people lost their lively hoods and that others will have unbearable workloads.  My only ‘conflict’ with our union is that pay raises are not more of a priority.
I’ve been told that I lose money by working here.  Cost of living goes up, but my salary does not. 

I personally do not believe the core issue of this action is of diversity, and that is not because
I am a ignorant woman of European descent.  I believe this as a member of the SJSU staff for 10 plus
years.  I am actually low on the seniority level, even at 10 years.  Our staff is rich and deep in
diversity of individuals, whether it be protected classes, cultures, life experiences or skills. 
This diversity has not happened only in the past couple years.  This diversity reaches, as
mentioned, to the core of the living values of San Jose State University.  I wish I had some
statistics to quote. 

Sincerely. The care and concern of the faculty and students is greatly appreciated.   
I just wish this rallying to staff defense would of happened when the layoffs were a part of the budget planning, not after the action.

I do want to support the efforts as I can.  I don’t want to argue or debate. 
The issue of diversity is actually close to my heart for personal reasons in my family, my
individual life experiences, as well as the core of my graduate degree education.   

I have been a loyal employee at SJSU because I had job security, flexibility, good benefits,
and I believe I have helped students graduate.  These reasons are quickly dissipating.

Thank you for hearing my side of the story.

Amy Freitag

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Update from Bob Rucker - Friday Morning  4/23

Given the news above from Steve Sloan about the planned rally next Thursday,
I suggest we finalize the wording in our letter and get it published
and circulated early next week.

Jan Shaw has done an excellent job editing draft one of this letter.
The revised letter will be posted here by late Friday.

Meanwhile...Our JMC students have already begun to express their concerns,
and so have our two affected staff members in the JMC School.

See the commentary from RTVJ student Dan Lu.
It was sent to and published online by the Spartan Daily. I encourage you to
speak to your classes about this issue and invite more student reactions.
As one student in my class said this week...
It's the year for student activism to return to a place noted for it.
Compliments to the Spartan Daily for their appreciation of this important story
and their detailed efforts to fully inform the campus!

This past Thursday, in my J132B (Adv. Broadcast News Writing) class,
 we began a special assignment on this issue for their final project.
To get us started, students have been assigned to research the history of labor negotiation
conflicts like this, plus find and study local and national news reports on the topic.
They know they must learn more about how and why major personnel change
decisions have evolved over time with "seniority" being the primary determinant. 

The class also plans to discretely identify and ask laid off and transferred staff on
campus if they'd like to talk about the human impact of these economic moves. I am and will
continue to caution them about the individual's right to privacy concerns.

Jessie Pickett was the first to agree to this and participate in a class press conference.
He also agreed to have his comments videotaped and used in any video news report
we post on line or broadcast.

Silvia La Rosa and I spoke briefly earlier this week. She has been on
jury duty and away from campus.  My J132B will extend an invitation to her, other affected staff
on campus, plus representatives of SJSU's administration, staff and faculty unions to offer
their perspectives by participating in one of our remaining hour long class press
conference learning experiences.

All guests have or will be told that this RTVJ class is developing a news story for online posting
and possible broadcast nationwide.  My J163 students now have a continuing relationship
with CNN where they provide west coast video reactions to timely news and Bay Area
human interest video news features. This new student media approach is called SJSU Online.
In the past year, their stories have been broadcast on several CNN news channels
and posted on their website main page. In March, SJSU Online coverage
of local reaction to the Toyota recall crisis received 37,000 views nationally and internationally.

I encourage you to keep your JMC School students posted on developments
and engage their ideas for how to creatively get involved with this
important campus issue. Like the CASA Dean told us Monday, it would be
great to see a return to the 1960's "Have A Voice!" activism on this campus. Thanks!



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amy Freitag comments & LAYOFF NOTICE LETTER  Thursday, April 22nd

I wanted to share a primary source regarding the staff layoffs.
 I have attached the CSU letter to the CSUEU union.

Layoffs were based on a budget number.  Approximately 56 vacant job positions
were eliminated first. Then changes were made solely on job classifications. 
The job classifications (and number of) were identified and then eliminated.  The personnel affected
by these job eliminations, were then identified by seniority and
re-assigned or laid off accordingly.   

One Administrator I talked to, seemed to think that “3 years was the magic number,
” as she didn’t see anyone laid off who had been working at SJSU 3 years or longer. 

I felt compelled to clarify how the staff layoffs were determined. 
It is important that the facts are known so that all dialogue is properly informed,
the wording of any official stance is accurate and reflect the facts. 

It is nice to see the support for staff that are affected by the reassignments. 
I personally think it would have been ideal if the layoffs were avoided, especially
when it was known that it was part of the budget planning in the
beginning of Fall Semester 2009.   

Amy

________________________________________________________________________

I do hope that we can get some sort of coverage to expose this issue.
It does affect the whole campus and system throughout the State.

Tim Hendrick
Assistant Professor, Advertising

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well done, Bob!  I think you effectively captured the sentiment of the room yesterday. And you've also clearly identified the problem of a seniority-based (only) layoffs. Maybe this will be the beginning of a real dialogue between the university and the unions about how to operationalize our diversity values. Monday's discussion has prompted me to do some research about the ethics of seniority-based layoffs. I'll let you know what I find out. In the meantime, good work!

Matt

Mathew A. Cabot, Ph.D., APR
Associate Professor
School of Journalism and Mass Communications

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BR Comments:

(Jan Shaw kindly edited the letter, tightening up sentences and offered very constructive suggestions, and said she liked the letter. )

(Mack Lundstrom stopped by my office to tell me the draft letter offered more restraint and patience than he might have. I share Mack's passion for this issue however.)

(Silvia is aware of our efforts. She told me today she is on jury duty this week but will be around next week.
She appreciates our desire to help. I promised her NOT to use her name or Jessie Picket's in anything
public without their prior permission.)

(Jessie spoke with me briefly today, and is aware of our efforts to generate a campus response.
Both Jessie and Silvia are aware of our meeting with the dean Tuesday.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two questions. 

Do you have statistics including numbers and self-identified members of protected classes for all positions eliminated, staff reassignments, and staff laidoffs compared to positions and staff “left behind?”. 

Do you have any primary resources (staff you have talked to)? 

Those may be core to the premise of your argument, and good to include in your statment?  

 Amy Freitag Resource Analyst

School of Journalism & Mass Communications
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bob:  Thoughtfully written.  There are a number of small edits.  I’d probably be inclined to condense it some, so I’m still mulling it over.  I think I’d be more direct in the beginning, too.  I’ll be interested in
what others think.  

Dr. Bill Briggs
Director
School of Journalism and Mass Communications

________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Back to TOP OF THIS PAGE                       ProfBob.com  HOME PAGE