2008
Candidate Campaigns
-
Boston Tea Party nominee
-
Constitution Party
nominee
-
Green Party nominee
-
Libertarian Party nominee
-
New American Independent
Party nominee
-
Party for Socialism and
Liberation nominee
-
Prohibition Party nominee
-
Socialist Party USA
nominee
-
5 Independent candidates
|
Nader,
Barr could tip close states in November
The San Luis Obispo Tribune
Sun, 31 Aug 2008

Third party
presidential candidates: Ralph Nader
(Independent Party), Bob Barr
(Libertarian Party),
Cynthia McKinney (Green Party). (PHOTO
CREDIT: GETTY IMAGES)
September 1,
2008
Fissure in
Nevada's
Republican Party
may hurt John
McCain in
November
National
officials worry
that Ron Paul
supporters will
vote for
Libertarian
nominee Bob
Barr,
potentially
handing the
swing state to
Barack Obama on
Election Day.
By Ashley
Powers, Los
Angeles Times
Staff Writer
LAS VEGAS --
Like any
good Western
showdown,
this one
begins in
the state's
dusty
outskirts,
amid
cowboys,
ranchers and
folks wary
of the
federal
government.
In January,
Rep. Ron
Paul
(R-Texas)
placed
second in
Nevada's
Republican
presidential
caucus --
well behind
Mitt Romney
but just
ahead of
Arizona Sen.
John McCain.
Paul's
anti-establishment
message
played
particularly
well in the
state's
rural
swaths.
Now, as
Republicans
gather in St.
Paul, Minn., to
formally pick
McCain as their
presidential
nominee, Paul
supporters are
fuming over a
nasty battle
that resulted in
two sets of
Nevada delegates
vying to be
seated at the
convention.
One delegation
is composed of
state party
insiders; the
other is loyal
to "Dr. Paul."
Lingering hard
feelings from
the fight could
mean trouble for
McCain this fall
as he tries to
carry Nevada,
which voted
Republican in
the last two
elections but is
considered a
battleground
state.
A Republican
National
Committee panel
ruled recently
that neither
delegate group
was chosen
correctly. The
panel chastised
the state party,
saying the
selection
process was
"flawed,
inadequate and
unacceptable"
and that it
appeared to bar
"grass-roots
activists."
The panel then
appointed its
own delegation,
which includes
both state GOP
picks and Paul
supporters, the
Associated Press
reported. But
even though 30
Paul delegates
had arrived in
Minnesota for
the convention
by Saturday,
Paul supporters
said, only four
are expected to
be seated.
The spat has
revealed a deep
fissure in
Nevada's
Republican
Party, which has
lost its voter
registration
edge and has
suffered because
of an unpopular
governor, Jim
Gibbons.
Much as
Democrats fear
that supporters
of Hillary
Rodham Clinton
will fail to
line up behind
Democratic
nominee Barack
Obama,
Republicans
worry that Paul
supporters will
cast ballots for
Libertarian
nominee Bob
Barr. (Paul was
the Libertarian
nominee in
1988.) Some
polls show that
Barr has the
backing of as
much as
one-tenth of
likely Nevada
voters, and that
McCain and Obama
are in a
statistical tie.
"There's this
element of
libertarians
who've never
been comfortable
in the
Republican
Party" and have
latched on to
Paul, said Bob
Brown, a senior
fellow at the
O'Connor Center
for the Rocky
Mountain West, a
regional studies
and public
education
program of the
University of
Montana. Those
voters might not
gravitate toward
McCain,
potentially
handing this
swing state to
Obama.
"They could
write in Paul,
or vote for
Barr, or choose
not to vote. It
doesn't make any
difference; what
they're not
doing is voting
for the
Republican
Party," said
Brown, a former
GOP candidate
for governor in
Montana.
McCain aides say
Paul supporters
should not pose
a problem.
McCain's
understanding of
Western land and
water issues,
and his choice
of Alaska Gov.
Sarah Palin as
his running
mate, will help
Republicans
carry frontier
states, they
say.
In 1992, Ross
Perot's
candidacy helped
Bill Clinton win
Nevada as well
as Montana and
Colorado. Perot
earned more than
a fifth of each
state's votes.
In 1996,
President
Clinton again
took Nevada,
with Perot
grabbing 10%.
Two years later,
a Libertarian
Senate candidate
siphoned enough
GOP ballots to
keep Nevada
Democrat Harry
Reid in the
Senate.
This cycle,
Nevada Democrats
-- buoyed by
record turnout
for their
caucuses --
carry a
75,000-person
lead in voter
registration,
according to the
secretary of
state. Just
three years ago,
Republicans held
an advantage of
1,200 voters.
Unlike Clinton,
Paul is not
calling for
party unity.
Thousands of his
supporters will
attend a "Rally
for the
Republic" on
Tuesday in
Minneapolis, not
far from the
site of the
Republican
convention. Some
of the faithful
will arrive in "Ronvoys."
Freewheeling
Nevada has
proved a
receptive
audience for
Paul's
shrink-the-government
pledge. Months
after the
caucuses, it is
not uncommon to
spot Paul signs
on remote
two-lane
roadways.
Wayne Terhune, a
dentist in
Sparks, Nev.,
registered
Republican just
so he could vote
for Paul.
Terhune liked
the candidate's
promises to
"keep government
in a box."
"I won't vote
for McCain, I
won't vote for
Obama -- that's
a vote for
tyranny," he
said.
In April,
Terhune and
others secured a
rule change at
the state GOP
convention that
gave Paul
supporters a
better chance to
be elected as
delegates. But
before most of
the ballots were
counted, party
officials shut
down the event
and turned off
the lights.
Organizers said
they simply ran
out of time.
Paul backers
said the goal
was to block
them from
winning
delegates. In a
nod to the
controversy, the
Nevadans for Ron
Paul 2008
website sells
T-shirts that
quip, "Don't
Gavel Me, Bro!"
The state party
and national GOP
officials did
not respond to
requests for
comment.
The state party
tried to hold a
second
convention in
July but could
not muster a
quorum. Instead,
it chose a
roster of party
loyalists to go
to Minnesota.
Paul supporters
balked, and the
dispute wound up
before the GOP
convention
panel.
"It would be
laughable if the
stakes weren't
so high," said
Terhune, who
came to
Minnesota as a
Paul supporter
but did not end
up in the Nevada
delegation. The
GOP offered him
passes to this
week's
festivities, but
he'll probably
attend only
events for Paul.
+ + + + + +
August 15, 2008
Posted: 05:50 PM
ET
FROM
CNN’s Jack Cafferty:
Americans
are disgusted with our dysfunctional
government, right?
They overwhelmingly
disapprove of
Congress and the president,
and for
straight 6 months now, at least 80% of
us say we’re dissatisfied
with where
this
country is headed.
So if the
system is indeed broken, it seems like
lots of Americans wouldn’t
want to vote
for either the Democrat or the
Republican in November.
However, a new
Gallup Poll finds that only 2% of
registered voters
name a third-party
candidate when asked who they’ll back
for president.
2%… that’s
compared to 83% who name either Barack
Obama or
John McCain. The third-party
candidates this time
around include Bob Barr for the
Libertarian Party, Independent
Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney for the Green
Party.
In 1992,
Ross Perot got almost 20% of the vote,
one of the best showings
ever for a
third-party candidate. In fact,
Perot may have been the reason why
Bill
Clinton won the first time around. But,
when it comes down to it, the way
the two-party system is set up often
makes it very difficult for third-party
candidates to get any traction. It’s an
uphill battle
to get on the ballot and to get the kind
of money necessary to compete.
Here’s my question to you:
Why isn’t there more support for third
party candidates?
READ PUBLIC RESPONSES |